Skip to main content

Making a splash in the stock market: Does listing status affect stakeholder orientation?

With that thought in mind, it has been dry lately, hasn’t it?

Water Small

Maybe that is why the media are very keen to talk about water, specifically about water companies and their dividends. A quick Google News search [ii] revealed 50,700 results for “water companies dividends UK”, and just to show that I take the business of blogging seriously, when I exchanged “retailers” for “water companies” the tally dropped to 28,600 results. News stories on dividends are presented alongside examples of unhappy water consumers (or would-be consumers depending on how you look at it). So we hear about dividend payments to shareholders in Severn Trent alongside the news that farmers in Derbyshire are digging their own wells, and about payments to United Utility shareholders being made days before the company brings in a hosepipe ban. Meanwhile those of us whose water is supplied by Thames Water worry about leaks, but not about dividends because last year the company announced that would not make any dividend payments until 2020.

Why the difference? Well, last year Thames Water received a record fine for sewage leaks back in 2013 and 14, so that is part of the story, but I wonder if the company’s private status is relevant here? Both Unitied Utilities and Severn Trent are listed on the London Stock Exchange, Thames Water is owned by Kemble Private Water Holdings, a private holding company. Maybe it is easier to adopt a stakeholder focus, in this case fixing your leaks, as a private business than it is when the stock market is keeping an eye on you. You may still lose shareholders, for example the USS held nearly 11% of the company’s equity on 12th January this year but do not feature in the list of owners now, but you don’t have to worry about a market reaction.

I could say more, but I just heard a rumble of thunder, so I must go and tell someone …

[i] Samuel Johnson (1758) Discourses on the weather

[ii] Friday 27th July Find out more about Dr Carol Padgett’s research.

Visit profile

Published 1 August 2018

You might also like

Heathrow Runway Takes Off

31 October 2016
Dr Andreas Hoepner, shares his thoughts on the long-awaited and much disputed decision regarding the Heathrow airport expansion.

Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending – ‘Bank on Dave’ and many others

4 March 2013
If you live in the UK, you may have seen the Channel 4 television programme on 28th February this year (2013) entitled ‘Bank on Dave’. Burnley Savings and Loans to give it its other name, is a company (not a bank) which offers 5% ‘deposit’ rates to lenders and offers loans to those who cannot obtain funding from the high street banks. So how does Dave do this when the high street banks offer no interest at all or perhaps only ½ or 1%? In fact ‘Dave’ is one of a new breed of ‘brokers’ who simply introduce lenders and borrowers to each other. The key difference from banks is that banks have a balance sheet with a depositor contract on one side and a separate contract with its borrowers on the other whereas a peer to peer company has no such contracts and indeed is not even involved at all in borrowing or lending! This is because in P2P, lending contracts are directly between borrower and lenders and the P2P company does not take ‘deposits’ on to its own balance sheet or keep the loans its customers make on its balance sheet.

EU/UK Scholarships announced for ICMA Centre Masters in Finance Programmes

29 October 2015
The ICMA Centre is delighted to announce a series of up to twenty 50% scholarships available to EU applicants for our 2016/17 Finance Masters programmes