Skip to main content

Should Investors Include Bitcoin in Their Portfolios? A Portfolio Theory Approach

Bitcoin 3406638 1920

A working paper by Dr Andrew Urquhart, in collaboration with Emmanouil Platanakis of the University of Bath, examines whether investors should include Bitcoin in their portfolio. Including alternative investments in traditional portfolios has been an area of some debate in recent years, with some studies indicating that they add value (for instance Conover et al 2010; Gao and Nardari 2018), while some find that alternative investments offer no benefit to investors (for instance Daskalaki and Skiadopoulos 2011; Bessler and Wolff 2015).

In this paper, the authors employ eight popular asset allocation strategies to assess the out-of-sample benefits from holding some Bitcoin in a traditional stock-bond portfolio. They show that across all competing asset allocation strategies and levels of risk aversions, the benefits of including Bitcoin are quite considerable with substantially higher risk-adjusted returns. The authors also show that their results are robust to alternative estimation windows, the incorporation of transaction costs, the inclusion of commodities in the portfolio, and two additional portfolio optimization techniques that incorporate higher moments.

Since it was first proposed by Nakamoto in 2008, Bitcoin has received lots of attention from investors, the media and regulators. Bitcoin is the most popular cryptocurrency in terms of trading volume and is a peer-to-peer electronic cash system which allows online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without relying on a financial institution. Therefore, unlike the vast majority of other financial assets, Bitcoin has no association with any higher authority, such as a government, firm, country or commodity. Bitcoin also has no physical representation and its value is based on the security of an algorithm which is able to trace all transactions between buyers and sellers. The attention received is due to its low transaction costs, peer-to-peer system and governmental free design. This has led to a surge in trading volume, volatility and price, with cryptocurrencies regularly appearing in the mainstream news.

Therefore this research adds to the growing literature of cryptocurrencies by showing that Bitcoin is an attractive proposition for investors and should be considered by portfolio managers. The full working paper can be found at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3215321.

Interested in Finance and FinTech? Find out more about our new MSc programme here.

Find out more about Dr Andrew Urquhart's research.

View Profile

Published 12 November 2018
Topics:
Research news

You might also like

Industry Insights - Leadership and Performance Under Pressure with Matthew Whitfield

28 February 2020
Matthew Whitfield joined us at the ICMA Centre on the 12 February 2020 to discuss how to perform under pressure and talk about leadership.
Industry Insights reviews

ICMA Centre appoints new head

6 September 2018
Dr Carol Padgett, has been appointed Head of the ICMA Centre from 1st October 2018. Her predecessor Professor Adrian Bell has taken on the University role of Research Dean for Prosperity and Resilience.

Academics Win Best Corporate Finance Paper Award 2016

8 November 2016
"Institutional Cross-ownership and Corporate Strategy: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions" by Professor Chris Brooks, Dr Yeqin Zeng, and PhD Zhong Chen has been awarded Best Corporate Finance Paper at the 2016 Southern Finance Association annual conference. About the paper: The paper provides new evidence on the important role of institutional investors in affecting corporate strategy. We study institutional investors who hold stocks of both acquirers and targets before the announcements of mergers and acquisitions (M&As). The existence of these institutional cross-owners not only increases the probability of two firms merging, but also affects the outcomes of M&As. Institutional cross-ownership reduces target firm prices, lowers completion probabilities of deals with negative acquirer announcement returns, and increases the use of stock payment in M&A transactions. Furthermore, deals with high institutional cross-ownership have lower transaction costs and disclose more transparent financial statement information.
Research news