Skip to main content

Corporate excess: Who cares about CEO pay?

ICMA Feature

The big question is: do employees and shareholders care?

Research on American companies suggests that employees don’t care, at least not in the way we might think. Faleye et al (2013) show that productivity is not affected by high pay ratios, except that is in companies with fewer employees. Interestingly, in these companies a high ratio spurs employees to greater efforts and productivity improves. Higher pay ratios are also good news for shareholders, because company value increases with the pay ratio.

So is anyone apart from the government and media, upset by high pay ratios?

The answer may be consumers. Unpublished research by Mohan et al (2015) shows that in experiments where consumers were told about relative pay, they were willing to pay higher prices for the same product if it was sold by a company with a lower pay ratio. In other words they wanted to punish firms that paid their CEOs “too much”.

If consumers are motivated to seek out the new data (a big “if”) and use it in their buying decisions this could affect profitability and company values, at which point shareholders and CEOs will have to become far more concerned about relative pay in British companies.

References:

Published 30 August 2017

You might also like

Best paper Award at the BAM Conference 2025

15 September 2025
Awarded Best Full Paper in the Financial Management Track at the BAM 2025 Conference for research on the policy impact of the UK Modern Slavery Act.
Business News Research news Department news Awards and prizes

Ranked first in Accounting and Finance degrees in the Guardian University league tables

4 June 2014
Rankings news

A Free Lunch?

29 August 2018
Fidelity, the asset manager with $2.4 trillion assets under management, recently announced the launch of two index mutual funds with a 0% fee! This announcement is interesting for several reasons. First, the asset management industry has been involved in an intense price war and this new fee level of 0% represents a very tough benchmark for the competition to beat. Not surprisingly, the share price of rival asset managers fell by a few percentage points shortly after the announcement. Second, the new fee level is unusual as it indicates that, for the first time, investors could get exposure to both US and international equities without incurring any fee. This is a curious business decision. How will Fidelity manage to pay for all its expenses? Will this product be a loss-making venture? Is there more to it than meets the eyes?