Skip to main content

Corporate excess: Who cares about CEO pay?

The Business Secretary, Greg Clarke has announced a series of corporate governance reforms, including a requirement for companies to publish the pay ratio which measures the pay of the CEO relative to the salary of their average UK employee. The aim of the reforms is to make companies more accountable to their employees and shareholders.

ICMA Feature

The big question is: do employees and shareholders care?

Research on American companies suggests that employees don’t care, at least not in the way we might think. Faleye et al (2013) show that productivity is not affected by high pay ratios, except that is in companies with fewer employees. Interestingly, in these companies a high ratio spurs employees to greater efforts and productivity improves. Higher pay ratios are also good news for shareholders, because company value increases with the pay ratio.

So is anyone apart from the government and media, upset by high pay ratios?

The answer may be consumers. Unpublished research by Mohan et al (2015) shows that in experiments where consumers were told about relative pay, they were willing to pay higher prices for the same product if it was sold by a company with a lower pay ratio. In other words they wanted to punish firms that paid their CEOs “too much”.

If consumers are motivated to seek out the new data (a big “if”) and use it in their buying decisions this could affect profitability and company values, at which point shareholders and CEOs will have to become far more concerned about relative pay in British companies.

References:

Published 30 August 2017

You might also like

ICMA Centre ranked in the world top 25 by the Financial Times

18 June 2012
The Financial Times Global Masters in Finance 2012 has ranked Henley Business School’s ICMA Centre in the top 25 in the world.
Rankings news

Are the employment figures quite as rosy as they seem?

15 September 2017
The UK employment and unemployment figures for the period May to July 2017 were announced yesterday and on the surface, the news is very good. The employment rate was 75.3 per cent, the highest since comparable records began in 1971. The number of people unemployed was 1.46 million, with the rate of unemployment being 4.3 per cent.

Peer to Peer (P2P) Lending – ‘Bank on Dave’ and many others

4 March 2013
If you live in the UK, you may have seen the Channel 4 television programme on 28th February this year (2013) entitled ‘Bank on Dave’. Burnley Savings and Loans to give it its other name, is a company (not a bank) which offers 5% ‘deposit’ rates to lenders and offers loans to those who cannot obtain funding from the high street banks. So how does Dave do this when the high street banks offer no interest at all or perhaps only ½ or 1%? In fact ‘Dave’ is one of a new breed of ‘brokers’ who simply introduce lenders and borrowers to each other. The key difference from banks is that banks have a balance sheet with a depositor contract on one side and a separate contract with its borrowers on the other whereas a peer to peer company has no such contracts and indeed is not even involved at all in borrowing or lending! This is because in P2P, lending contracts are directly between borrower and lenders and the P2P company does not take ‘deposits’ on to its own balance sheet or keep the loans its customers make on its balance sheet.